Another way to look at this formulation is that he has risked India’s economic well-being at the altar of his political dominance. In speeches after abolishing 86 per cent of India’s currency, Mr Modi stressed his policy was guided by the objective of removing disparities between rich and poor. True that in 2014, the Modi wave assumed proportions of a tsunami in several northern states because of support from social groups that had previously not supported the Bharatiya Janata Party.

The verdict in UP will reveal if Mr Modi has read the mind of the electorate correctly or not. There is no certainty that with these initiatives Mr Modi has made identity politics irrelevant. Criticism of the government’s action per se makes them open to charges of anti-nationalism, clearly the favourite invective of this regime for its adversaries. After all, no one is willing to accept being cogs in the wheel of an unscrupulous economic order. Ironically, the swiftest way to recovery would be through a clear BJP majority as Mr Modi’s political ascendancy will again shore up investments and economy. The effort is to provide an illusion to the poor by publicising claims that the decision has been aimed at stripping the rich of their ill-gotten wealth. What we are witnessing are not minor hiccups but a major stumble and testimony to the fact that similar to the past, Mr Modi this time too has chosen to prioritise optics of the shock therapy he has prescribed for the economy. He has one again presented a dazzling idea in a blaze of publicity, ensuring that every other issue that the nation was preoccupied with in the weeks prior to November 8 is pushed to the background. Simultaneously, however, his working as Prime Minister has exposed his inadequacy at planning and working out the fundamentals of new programmes. Amendments made to specifics announced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi in his inexpungible address to the nation puts paid to the claim that the plan was in preparation for several months.

Cultural motifs used to secure support for demonetisation evoke religious imagination by terming it mahayajna and drawing parallels with the pre-Diwali housecleaning ritual. Like all political campaigns of Mr Modi, there is a majoritarian lining to the fabric displayed. Two major steps that Mr Modi has taken in recent weeks are indicative of the comprehension that he had reached the now-or-never moment. There was need to saturate the Indian polity at this stage once again with the fantasy of a decisive leader who has no pursuit but the country’s. Ultra-nationalists always present a sanctimonious facade and Mr Modi is no different, no effort is spared to project that he is the sole guardian of the national interest. This tactic puts the Opposition in a spot, as it is tricky to demolish the claim completely.. But this backing was transitory, neo-supporters flocked because the BJP’s electoral plank was erected on a combination of social polarisation, utopian future and most importantly strong anti-incumbent sentiment. The outcome of the demonetisation drive will at best marginally cleanse the Indian economy. The plan to overnight scrap two banknotes, of which one at least cannot be considered high value given the current worth of the Indian rupee, has once again established that Mr Modi is poor in architecture and structural engineering of new initiatives that he launches.At almost the precise mid-point of Mr Modi’s tenure few can escape the realisation that not a single initiative over the past two and a half years holds the capacity of being a vote spinner in the next parliamentary polls. It was not for nothing that party publicists termed demonetisation as another "surgical strike" within hours of the stunning announcement. Not for the first time, the Prime Minister has linked his political fortunes with the well-being of the country. Time will determine whether dalits in Uttar Pradesh will ignore repeated instances of humiliation from the government and vote for Mr Modi’s party because he initiated steps that have economically weakened (if for a moment we believe that they indeed will be impacted) the village bania, thakur or their urban tormentors. The positives will not offset losses from the economic slump expected to set in for several months. Steps taken with the proclaimed objective of flushing out black money have primarily a political purpose, specially with polls in key states looming ahead.That is my principal objection to life, I think: It’s too easy, when alive, to make perfectly horrible mistakes. Support from the middle classes is being garnered by marketing the belief that the economic strata above them will suffer more. This is not possible unless altering the fundamentals of the economic system, but there is no stopping Mr Modi from paying lip service. Piety cannot be monopoly of a leader or party.— Kurt VonnegutThe government’s frequent adjustment of withdrawal limits and deadlines for using the scrapped Rs 1,000 and Rs 500 banknotes at select utilities is attestation that the great Indian idea of jugaad, considered passé in recent times, is flourishing and with government backing.There is no certainty that the ploy will work, that those below the middle-middle classes will become the primary electoral base of the BJP.Besides leaving an indelible mark on history, at par with some of his predecessors, Mr Modi was guided by the necessity to widen his party’s electoral base and shed its image of being a trader-centric party. When the "successes" of the government are listed by the BJP during the campaign, there will be further attempts to milk this sentiment. The message being broadcast is evident: the Prime Minister is launching an offensive against cross-border terrorists and their backers while concurrently targeting those who are hollowing out the economy. On numerous occasions in the past, Mr Modi has come across as a first-rate implementer with capacity to energise existing schemes and an ideas man. Yet the BJP’s voteshare stayed restricted at 31 per cent and to go beyond this, the class support of the BJP must expand. For a 600D fabric Factory PM who was expected to herald major reforms in India’s economy, Mr Modi’s first two years were unexpectedly tepid and the pressure for big-bang reforms was mounting.

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Lucknow: Several instances of the communal harmony and secular fabric of the country coming under attack by several groups are being increasingly reported around our diverse country, as it China Bag fabric Manufacturers has given rise to a grave situation.But amid all the negativity and fear, some people come as rays of hope for the society, through their exemplary actions contributing to communal bonhomie. Visitors at the La-Touche Road Puja Sangsad will be getting a taste of the kheer with a flavour of communal harmony. He said that if his donation contributes to religious unity, he will keep doing it. Daulat Ali Ghosi from Lucknow is one such gentleman who is bring praised for his gesture.Daulat Ali Ghosi supplied 60 litres of milk for kheer to be offered to Goddess Durga.

The authorities of the puja committee also welcomed the donation by Ghosi who said that he did this routinely for every festival in the city, but the response for this was overwhelming.Ghosi who constantly works for communal harmony has also aided the creation of a group that saves cattle who have gone astray and fall into wells or ditches.The milkman is delivering 60 litres of milk for making kheer that’ll be offered to goddess Durga during the ongoing festivities.

Hide Comments | Add Comment

"We need to change ourselves in order to change the society at large. "What is quite easy to understand is that Hindutva is the quality of Bharat and that is why Hindutva is rashtriyata (nationalism).Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh 600D fabric Factory (RSS) chief Mohan Bhagwat has made another controversial statement when he said that there is no law in the country that prevents Hindus from having more children.

On suggestions and concerns raised by the teachers for salaries and change in education system, Mr Bhagwat said that he will convey their messages to the education ministry or they, on their own, can send a detailed letter to the Union education minister..During an interactive session with teachers and students in Agra, the RSS chief said, "Which law asked Hindus to produce fewer children If their (Muslim) population is increasing then why your numbers are not growing " Mr Bhagwat was responding to a question on the RSS’ stand on the "disproportionate" rise in population of Muslims." During his lecture on Hindu culture, Mr Bhagwat said that Bharat and Hindu have the same meaning and the entire world describes India as Hindu. If we want to improve our education system, we have to change ourselves first," he added.Speaking on Hindutva, he said it is ingrained in the fabric of India and that is why Hindutva is nationalism.While addressing a large gathering of university and college teachers, he said that to improve the current education system we have to change our attitude towards it.

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Rahul Gandhi had alleged that the RSS was responsible for the death of Mahatma Gandhi. Gandhi had earlier urged the apex court to reject the defamation case filed against him by the RSS in March.The apex court had earlier in April adjourned the plea till second week of May. You can’t make wholesale denunciation of an organisation.According to reports, the Congress vice-president had also turned down the Supreme Court's offer to express regret for his comment holding the RSS responsible for Mahatma Gandhi's assassination and get the defamation case filed against him buried.

The Supreme Court has slammed Rahul Gandhi, while hearing a plea by the Congress vice-president in a defamation case filed against him for his remarks about the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS).The apex court had on July 9 heard the plea of Gandhi seeking a stay on the Bombay High Court order, refusing to quash the defamation case against him over his remark on the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS).Rapping Rahul, the Supreme Court bench observed, "Whether you spoke for the public good or not, the case must be decided on its merits.."Observing that ‘history is the biggest enemy of privacy’, the SC said that the purpose of law was not to turn citizens into litigants.Gandhi had alleged that the RSS was responsible for the death of Mahatma Gandhi.Subsequently, the apex court ordered Rahul Gandhi to detail his arguments in the case by July 27.Gandhi's counsel had earlier argued that there are several judgements and evidences that would prove that the defamation DTY Polyester Oxford Fabrics Suppliers case filed against him was frivolous.Earlier, Gandhi had accused the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the RSS of trying to create disruption in plural but harmonious social fabric in Assam.

Hide Comments | Add Comment